Oxfordstrat
Search
  • PRODUCTS
  • RESOURCES
  • R&D BLOG
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT

R&D Blog

Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator | Trading Strategy (Entry)

I. Trading Strategy

Developer: Etienne Botes and Douglas Siepman (Vortex Indicator). Concept: Dual momentum trading strategy based on Vortex Indicator. Research Goal: Performance verification of dual momentum signals. Specification: Table 1. Results: Figure 1-2. Trade Filter: Long Filter: Slow Positive Vortex Indicator (+VI1) is above Slow Negative Vortex Indicator (−VI1). Short Filter: Slow Negative Vortex Indicator (−VI1) is above Slow Positive Vortex Indicator (+VI1). Trade Setup: Long Setup: Fast Positive Vortex Indicator (+VI2) is above Fast Negative Vortex Indicator (−VI2). Short Setup: Fast Negative Vortex Indicator (−VI2) is above Fast Positive Vortex Indicator (+VI2). Trade Entry: Table1. Trade Exit: Table 1. Portfolio: 42 futures markets from four major market sectors (commodities, currencies, interest rates, and equity indexes). Data: 40 years since 1980. Testing Platform: MATLAB®.

II. Sensitivity Test

All 3-D charts are followed by 2-D contour charts for Profit Factor, Sharpe Ratio, Ulcer Performance Index, CAGR, Maximum Drawdown, Percent Profitable Trades, and Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio. The final picture shows sensitivity of Equity Curve.

Tested Variables: Look_Back_#1 & Time_Index (Definitions: Table 1):

Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Profit Factor
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Profit Factor
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Sharpe Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Sharpe Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: UPI
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: UPI
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: CAGR
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: CAGR
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Max. Drawdown
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Max. Drawdown
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Percent Profitable Trades
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Percent Profitable Trades
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Equity

Figure 1 | Portfolio Performance (Inputs: Table 1; Commission & Slippage: $0).

STRATEGYSPECIFICATIONPARAMETERS
Auxiliary Variables:True Range (TR):
TR[i] = max(High[i], Close[i − 1]) − min(Low[i], Close[i − 1]);
Vortex Indicator (VI):
+VM[i] = |High[i], Low[i − 1]);
−VM[i] = |Low[i], High[i − 1]);
+VMS1[i] = sum(+VM over the Look_Back_#1 period);
−VMS1[i] = sum(−VM over the Look_Back_#1 period);
+VMS2[i] = sum(+VM over the Look_Back_#2 period);
−VMS2[i] = sum(−VM over the Look_Back_#2 period);
TRS1[i] = sum(TR over the Look_Back_#1 period);
TRS2[i] = sum(TR over the Look_Back_#2 period);
+VI1[i] = +VMS1[i] / TRS1[i];
−VI1[i] = −VMS1[i] / TRS1[i];
+VI2[i] = +VMS2[i] / TRS2[i];
−VI2[i] = −VMS2[i] / TRS2[i];
Index: i ~ Current Bar.
Look_Back_#1 = [20, 200], Step = 5;
Look_Back_#2 = round(Look_Back_#1 * 0.5);
Setup:Long Trades: (+VI2[i] > −VI2[i]);
Short Trades: (−VI2[i] > +VI2[i]);
Index: i ~ Current Bar.
 
Filter:Long Trades: (+VI1[i] > −VI1[i]);
Short Trades: (−VI1[i] > +VI1[i]);
Index: i ~ Current Bar.
 
Entry:Extreme Point Rule: The extreme point is: (a) the highest point of a session when (+VI1[i] > −VI1[i]) & (+VI2[i] > −VI2[i]); (b) the lowest point of a session when (−VI1[i] > +VI1[i]) & (−VI2[i] > +VI2[i]). A buy/sell signal is triggered when a price moves beyond the extreme point.
Index: i ~ Current Bar.
 
Exit:Time Exit: nth day at the close, n = Time_Index.
Stop Loss Exit: ATR(ATR_Length) is the Average True Range over a period of ATR_Length. ATR_Stop is a multiple of ATR(ATR_Length). Long Trades: A sell stop is placed at [Entry − ATR(ATR_Length) * ATR_Stop]. Short Trades: A buy stop is placed at [Entry + ATR(ATR_Length) * ATR_Stop].
Time_Index = [1, 196],
Step = 5;
ATR_Length = 20;
ATR_Stop = 6;
Sensitivity Test:Look_Back_#1 = [20, 200], Step = 5
Time_Index = [1, 196], Step = 5
 
Position Sizing:Initial_Capital = $1,000,000
Fixed_Fractional = 1%
Portfolio = 42 US Futures
ATR_Stop = 6 (ATR ~ Average True Range)
ATR_Length = 20
 
Data:42 futures markets; 40 years (1980/01/01−2020/2/28) 

Table 1 | Specification of Trading Strategy.

III. Sensitivity Test with Commission & Slippage

Tested Variables: Look_Back_#1 & Time_Index (Definitions: Table 1):

Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Profit Factor
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Profit Factor
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Sharpe Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Sharpe Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: UPI
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: UPI
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: CAGR
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: CAGR
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Max. Drawdown
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Max. Drawdown
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Percent Profitable Trades
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Percent Profitable Trades
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio
Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator: Equity

Figure 2 | Portfolio Performance (Inputs: Table 1; Commission & Slippage: $100 Round Turn).

IV. Benchmarking

We benchmark the base case strategy against alternatives:

Case #1: Look_Back_#2 = 20; Look_Back_#1 = 40; Time_Index = ∞ (i.e. no time exit).
Case #2: Look_Back_#2 = 50; Look_Back_#1 = 100; Time_Index = ∞ (i.e. no time exit).
Case #3: Look_Back_#2 = 80; Look_Back_#1 = 160; Time_Index = ∞ (i.e. no time exit).
Case #4: Look_Back_#2 = 110; Look_Back_#1 = 220; Time_Index = ∞ (i.e. no time exit).

Fixed Fractional Sizing
Case #1Case #2Case #3Case #4
Net Profit ($)89,599,218498,235,877392,809,649681,833,581
Sharpe Ratio0.610.800.800.89
Ulcer Performance Index (UPI)0.500.740.961.09
Profit Factor1.061.121.201.31
CAGR (%)11.8816.7316.1317.85
Max. Drawdown (%)(64.43)(57.53)(49.87)(57.01)
Percent Profitable Trades (%)33.5731.3330.3930.95
Avg. Win / Avg. Loss Ratio2.092.452.742.92

Table 2 | Inputs: Table 1; Fixed Fractional Sizing: 1%; Commission & Slippage: $100 Round Turn.

V. Rating: Dual Momentum & Vortex Indicator | Trading Strategy

A/B/C/D

VI. Summary

(a) A dual momentum trading strategy based on Vortex Indicator performs better than a single momentum trading strategy based on Vortex Indicator; (b) Longer holding periods are preferred, i.e. Time_Index > 50 bars.

Related Entries: Vortex Indicator (Entry) | Fractal Adaptive Moving Average (Setup) | Simple Moving Average Filter (Entry & Exit)
Related Topics: (Public) Trading Strategies

CFTC RULE 4.41: HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

RISK DISCLOSURE: U.S. GOVERNMENT REQUIRED DISCLAIMER | CFTC RULE 4.41

Codes: matlab/vortex/2

←   Previous Article
Next Article   →
  • Data
  • Ideas
  • Indicators
  • Strategies
  • Traders

We share what we learn.

Sign up to receive research news and exclusive offers.

Learn more about our models.

Email us

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Guarantee
  • Privacy
  • Risk Disclosure
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • RSS
©2025 Oxford Capital Strategies Ltd | Reg. No. 7590685

What are you looking for?